<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Friends of Lever Park &#187; constitution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leverpark.co.uk/tag/constitution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leverpark.co.uk</link>
	<description>Protecting Lever Park and Rivington for the future...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 23:03:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Judge for yourself</title>
		<link>http://www.leverpark.co.uk/2010/05/judge-for-yourself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.leverpark.co.uk/2010/05/judge-for-yourself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 20:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bobdootson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chorley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leverpark.co.uk/?p=948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Ombudsman stated: Article 74 of the final decision: &#8220;I have also found that the Council acted with maladministration by not complying with its own constitution that excludes officers from using delegated powers to determine planning applications on sites that are over one hectare and the decision would be contrary to a written comment received [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ombudsman stated:</p>
<blockquote><p>Article 74 of the final decision:</p>
<p>&#8220;I have also found that the Council acted with maladministration by not complying with its own constitution that excludes officers from using delegated powers to determine planning applications on sites that are over one hectare and the decision would be contrary to a written comment received from a consultee&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
<p>The Council have stated:</p>
<blockquote><p>In order to clarify, Chorley BC do not accept the findings of the Local Government Ombudsman in the decision note where they relate to alleged breaches of the Council&#8217;s Constitution. It is not accepted the use of delegated powers amounted to a breach of the Constitution.</p>
<p>That is the position of the Council.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Lets see what the Ombudsman makes of this, or are they as usefull has a chocolate fireguard?</strong></p>
<p><strong>The Constitution is there for a reason, and cannot be interpreted in any other way&#8221; Responsibility for Functions&#8221; appendix 2 of the Constitution 6.6  C (ii)</strong></p>
<div>
<div></div>
</div>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.leverpark.co.uk%2F2010%2F05%2Fjudge-for-yourself%2F&amp;title=Judge%20for%20yourself" id="wpa2a_2">Share/Bookmark</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.leverpark.co.uk/2010/05/judge-for-yourself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

