Car Park Proposals
Sep 26th, 2008 by David
As we understand it, United Utilities’ proposals are:
- to create a new pay and display car park in a field adjacent to the Lower Barn on land that is legally not part of Lever Park.
- to make the current car parks in Rivington pay and display
- to charge between 50p and £1 for parking (probably 50p for a couple of hours and a pound for all day parking, with a season ticket option for £60-£70 pa)
- to introduce a one way system forcing up along the road to the top barn, then down an existing bridleway back to the main road
- to improve the road surfaces on the new one way system
Here are some of the criticisms voiced by myself and others:
- The land was given to the people of Bolton and Chorley by Lord Leverhulme for free access. This right is enshrined in the relevant by-laws, so United Utilities cannot charge for car parking on any of the current car parks.
- At peak times, more people will park on the public highway (i.e. the main road to Rivington and street off Lever Park Avenue and Sheephouse Lane) rather than pay for parking.
- The only peak times are between 11.00am and 4.00pm on Saturday, Sunday and Bank Holidays. Extra car parks will be redundant at all other times and days.
- Will the money raised by car parks be spent on the Lever Park area? If so, how much money do they expect to raise.
- Will the money be publicly accountable?
- What is the environmental impact of converting a field into a car park. What wildlife is in the field currently? What is the visual impact of field of tarmac or gravel?
- If the changes make Lever Park more popular, the number of car journeys into the park will increase at a time when Greater Manchester is considering wide-ranging strategies to reduce car journeys. So why no public transport options within the plans? No improvements to the cycle paths? A bus service used to run at weekends from Horwich.
- Horwich, Bolton and Chorley have a large number of people without access to a car. For the less able-bodied, Rivington is currently out of reach (there being no public transport into the area) – why are these people not being addressed by these plans?
- Alternatively, car park charges could make Lever Park less popular. Car park charges in nearby Bolton town centre have proved contentious. If fewer people visited the park, clearly this would run against Lord Leverhulme’s original vision.
- The proposed one-way system forces cars to return to the main road at a dangerous spot.
- There is currently a lack of clarity of the way in which money raised from the car parking charges would be re-invested. United Utilities need to be very clear about what the money will be spent on.
- Concerns were also expressed that the planning process for the recently approved ‘Go Ape’ centre didn’t give enough people chance to make their feelings known.
It’s early stages, the plans are just proposals and will are subject to planning permission and more involvement from the Highways experts. United Utilities will consult with other local groups including parish councils and local councillors.
As someone who lives in Rivington I have to use the car parks to take my children to school, go to church or visit friends. It seems really unjust that United Utilities can make a profit out of my children attending school.
I am also concerned about the effect it will have on local roads if visitors choose to park anywhere they can rather than pay to park.